• How To Enchant A Socket Diablo 3 2
• Diablo 3 Ramaladni's Gift

Diablo 3’s Enchanting Nightmare comes and goes. Enchanting is usually awesome, and I’m very happy when I see a socket appear on a weapon, or nail a big Critical hit Damage roll on a ring, etc. That said, there are wild disparities between different item slots, and those drive some players crazy. After all, some item slots have just a few other Primary Affixes, and on those it’s easy to get the upgrade you’re after.Other times it’s not so easy.Off hand items are the most notorious, with at least a dozen options and literally 30+ possible affixes (if you’re rolling it or a +skill damage isn’t already on the item). Not far behind come amulets, with a dozen or more possible affixes and a very wide range of possible values.

Thus, the Nightmare Conundrum (which I’m pretty sure I’ve seen as the name of a Nephalem Rift). What’s your least favorite enchanting effort? Off hand items are the worst – I recall rerolling wizard orb like 40 times and still not getting the crit chance(I did not want perfect roll 10% crit chance, I wanted ANY crit chance value – but didn’t get it). Luckily it was just a rare one so I wasn’t spending souls on it, but I still salvaged the item in rage after spending ton of gold. As far as Legs are concerned, I spend the most(15) souls on rolling 2 sockets on pants.In my opinion the best fix would be to increase the number of offered options each time you reroll the item.

Choice of 3 affixes the first time, 4 on the second reroll, 5 choices on the third reroll etc. This way there would still be the element of randomness, but it would significantly increase the chance of getting what you want over time – greatly reducing the frustration when rerolling for the 15th time and still not getting socket on your weapon.

So ultimately you’d be almost guaranteed to get what you want. What do you guys think?. I think letting us choose how many we want to roll for various prices. 2 for current prices (but make jewelry the same, no added gem cost), add a Flawless Imperial gem for 3 (emerald for weapon/shield/off-hand rolls, diamond for helm/rings, ruby for chest/shoulders/bracers, topaz for shoulders/amulets/gloves, amethyst for legs/pants), remove the Flawless Imperial but add a Royal gem for 4, then finally a Flawless Royal for 5.

That way you can go for a higher chance, but it’s a heavy gold sink, or if you have the mats to keep trying, you can! It makes sense, it’s a sink, makes you play the game Yeah, I’m usually on Blizzard’s side with things like this haha!. I’ve seen that suggestion, that you pay a higher price (maybe double the gold and materials) for more enchanting options.

I don’t think it’s a terrible idea, but how is it functionally different than just doing twice as many rolls?If the system fundamentally favored it, say by guaranteeing 3 or 4 different values (instead of the 2 the same we often get now), it could be an interesting feature. If you’re poor, do you save up to do the luxury enchant, since it’s more bang for the buck overall, even though you might get lucky with the bargain version?. This has been mentioned before but primary AND secondary affix enchanting should work independently. If I need to roll healthglobes on an item I wan’t to be in the position to do so, or roll away from fire resist so I can get all resist as a primary affix.As a barb the +hltglobe stat is very important. SO much so, back before I was running Raekor’s set. I crafted shoulders that 1) would either end up perfect str/vit/ar/cooldown reduct and secondary stat hlthglobes OR would have just one thing wrong with them that I can correct.Know how many shoulders I needed to craft?3 Inventories FULL worth of shoulders.Now tell me what are the odds that I get a SET shoulder (raekor/earth) that comes with a healthglobes bonus and str/vit/ar/cdrAnswer: approaching zero!.

Enchanting is really a headache especially in the early parts of the game when you are scouring for forgotten souls. Then not only that when you are crafting it requires two souls and if you happen to get a good item with one affix you want to reroll you need a soul to do it.One of the major complaints I had was that in general no one ever rolls a secondary affix. It is almost not worth the risk of rerolling a secondary affix since sometime in the future you may want to change a primary affix.If I had to improve enchanting I would removed to dual roll from it.

Have the game drop enchanting scrolls where the enchanter learns how to enchant a particular stat. That way when you want critical hit chance on an item you choose critical chance on the item and now you get the random roll of a number.

That way it doesn’t feel like you are wasting materials enchanting items especially legs.Finally I do believe the enchanter was meant as a gold sink and while I can see that as being cool and all in its current iteration its not fun and frankly it can be too much of a gold sink /material sink more often than not. I’ve rolled secondary affixes a few times on armor that rolls perfectly. Say you want mainstat, vit, res all, and sockets or +damage to a skill. You get all 4 on the initial roll, so your only enchant would be to boost the mainstat by like 34 points. Not really worth it.But you can get some pretty good stuff on secondary mods. Reduces damage from elites, or a big boost to fire or arcane res (if you don’t have RA as a primary), or even pick up radius or life after each kill is very worth having, as compared to some of the really irrelevant secondary affixes. Three things that need to be done to fix enchanting:1) Cap the gold costWhen a player gets unlucky rerolling, gold costs can quickly get out of hand.

I’d put a cap somewhere between 250k and 500k. Souls, not gold, should be the limiting material. Though jewelry costs are fixed, the gem costs can be pretty steep.

I’d fix this by allowing caches.earned. in torment difficulty to drop imperial gems.2) You cannot roll your current affix at a lower valueWhile every alternate affix is at least in theory a viable choice, a lower value of the same affix is a complete waste of an option. The way to make this work is to reroll every time RNG picks your affix at a lower value. Players will find their current affix less often, but it will always be an upgrade and these upgrades will actually be slightly more common than they are now.3) Temporarily lower the chance of rejected affixes.Every time you pass up an affix its chance to roll is lowered. This lost chance is split equally between any.non-reduced. affixes. Reduced roll chance affixes slowly increase back to their base value each subsequent reroll.Whenever a player replaces/upgrades their current affix, the new affix has its roll chance set at the base value and any lost chance is split equally between.all.

affixes.It would be worth considering an option to return (all?) reduced chance affixes back to their base chance. This!“Smart Enchanting” with addition of never rolling the same affix for second and third option would be great. So great in fact that I would gladly settle for just that. Changing affix roll chances by rejecting them would be another huge bonus.It would be nice to have some control of what is rolling. It can’t be too easy ‘cos the game would stop being fun very quickly (personal experience with Diablo 1 item editor). Make it ridiculously time consuming -“Hey! Bring me ten of every legendary crafting material including keys and Staff of Hearding mats and you can roll an affix of your choice with just the numbers random”.

This would give us some goal to strive for not just yanking the slot machine handle and praying to uncaring RNG gods 😉I miss Horadric Cube btw. The irony is I wrote this yesterday evening, and then playing that night I found a great quiver for my HC DH on EU.No legendary affixes on that one, but big roll to dex and vit, inherent IAS, 9% CC, and it’s even got +discipline and freeze chance on secondary. Everything you really want, and it had one spare primary affix life regen.So I’ve basically got a free primary affix, with everything essential already covered. Which is fun, but I can see this thing eating every spare Soul I get from now until the end of time, since I’ll be forever tempted to tinker with it. I’m not even sure what I most want in that enchant.

+damage to elites or +hatred regen are my first thoughts, mostly since I’m not set in my final build yet so I don’t know which particular skill I really want to boost.I did one roll and got 13% life, which I figured was good enough for now. It is a HC char, after all.

How To Enchant A Socket Diablo 3 2

But long term? I guess I’ll keep hoping to find a Kridershot and then try to roll Elemental Arrow on the quiver. Also, the complaints most people make about Enchanting, I’d rather save my money for upgrading gems, crafting, and repairing.– You can reroll multiple options of the same statistic (should be smart, pick the highest, and give you different options for the others)– You can ‘downgrade’ a statistic (should be smart, should only offer equal or greater than what you already have)– It’s too much RNG it wastes money. Gems have no RNG and at least with crafting you have some dependability of some statistics, sometimes, not to mention smart loot. So far I have no luck Enchanting of course I know its a kind of gambling,I think I have tried to get a socket in my quiver without result and the same with a few other items, sometimes I have get the same useless options10-15 times in a row?? A guy he told he never enchanting and must admit right now i have stopped enchanting I feel more or less its waste of time,but has heard about some Lucky punch`s from other players.instead of 3 options there should be five so chance for a Lucky outcome would be better,. Only a couple of hours ago I dropped a Cindercoat, thank the rng gods.It didn’t have any sockets so as you do i rolled it and got 2 sockets, bummer eh.

The problem was on my next roll both of the options presented were also 2 sockets. Has there even been any rumors as to wether they would bother to do something about this as it seems entirely pointless and aggravating. I can’t imagine time is an issue for implementing a check to ensure the same value does not show up twice as the coding for it is incredibly simple. I know that this option is not going to be popular, but why do we have to roll anything anyways? Does anyone here actually like the randomness of rolling enchants? I know that I personally don’t.My suggestion would be to change enchanting to when you select a value to replace, it gives you the entire list to select from for a substantial cost, you get to select what you want – socket, chd, chc,%ele etc then it can roll values for that in a wide range example chc on amulet could be 1% – 15% still keeps an rng flavor but at least you are working towards something. Remove anything less than max sockets.

Seriously, wth is the point of 1 or 2 sockets in a chest? This isn’t D2 – there are no RWs2. Do something to reduce the “RNG” absurdity. I’ve seen a lot of good suggestions. Ok, i lied, the lack of freedom to test builds isn’t just a set/lego-unique properties complaint.

I am prevented (at least in my mind) of trying out a legit fire build b/c I cannot roll 3 sockets on my Cindercoat. Just give me 3 sockets and I can actually ENJOY and take advantage of the ability to not be pigeonholed into a certain build just b/c I have to rely on an unreliable drop/enchant system.“Want to try a new build? Ok, enjoy waiting for a drop or spending a F-ton of mats!” Is that Blizz’s selling point now?Comments are closed.

Diablo 3 Ramaladni's Gift

Diablo 3's will see the addition of a new Artisan, Myriam Jahzia, the Mystic. She'll aid players in their quest to keep the forces of Hell at bay by Enchanting and Transmogrifying their items, Blizzard explained in a post that reintroduces the Mystic.Enchanting in Reaper of Souls allows players to re-roll one of the properties of a rare or legendary class item for another, possibly better random property. Players are required to pay a gold and material cost to complete the Enchanting process, but the Mystic's skills will likely pay off for players looking to tweak an item that's not perfectly suited to their needs.Transmogrifying an item in Diablo 3: Reaper of Souls lets players alter the appearance of that item without sacrificing its properties. Players who prefer the look of a particular armor item, for example, can visit the Mystic and pay in gold to change its style, leading to better dressed heroes. There are some restrictions and rules that govern Transmogrifying in Reaper of Souls, which Blizzard details at the.The Mystic was originally planned to appear in Diablo 3, but the developer removed her from the game after determining that her function was redundant in the game's customization system.Diablo 3: Reaper of Souls is scheduled for release in 2014 on.